The Bad
If you get a SPOT, you should be warned that this is not the kind of device that you can just take out and start playing with. For one, the signal isn’t good enough, and two - my biggest complaint - is that the indicator lights are terrible. It takes some getting used to in order to figure out exactly what the SPOT is doing (and what it isn’t). Plus, the SPOT doesn’t really seem to be meant for any kind of “instant action”. You can’t click a button and expect an email or text message to come right away, so it’s difficult to pull it out of the box and start testing it. You really have to carry it around for a while in order to get a sense of whether or not it’s working.

The other big bummer is that the signal just isn’t that good. I was generally okay with the GPS signal while hiking through trees and on cloudy days, but the actual data signal didn’t seem to be great which means you may be getting data, but you won’t always be sending it. Supposedly it uses the Globalstar Simplex network which I’ve heard people having general issues with. The other problem is that because it’s a simplex network, you won’t get any indication that your message has arrived. The receiver only does one-way transmission so it can’t tell you if the message was actually received.

Finally, I hate the clip. It doesn’t attach well to my pack.

The Good
The SPOT is tough. I dropped it off my 2nd story balcony onto cement and the sucker kept on ticking (my heart did skip a beat however because I’d only gotten it that day). I also like the user interface on the SPOT mapping application. It uses Ajax and Google Maps and does a pretty good job of plotting things. One thing I don’t like is that it isn’t always as granular as I would like so sometimes the dots are squished together if I’m not moving fast enough.

It’s also fun to share GPS stuff. Aside from sensitivity issues, the SPOT generally picks up most of my tracks and gets messages sent out most of the time. It’s fun to be able to checkin to places remotely and give my parents a map of exactly where I am. The help and 911 features are also great. As an emergency device, SPOT is perfect. It gets most of the messages out, and would give anyone trying to find you a huge advantage - so in my opinion that in itself is worth the price of admission.

The other great thing about the SPOT is the battery life. It only takes Lithium batteries, but it lasts forever. Something like 14 days when you’re in the track mode which pings the satellites every 10 minutes and 7 days in 911 mode which does it every 2-3 minutes I think. So you’ll be in good shape if you bring a couple of extra Lithium batteries.

Conclusion
It’s a great idea with far from perfect execution but they’ve started off on the right foot. As a social media device, SPOT falls far short, but as an emergency device, it’s excellent, and that’ really what it was made for. If you do a lot of backpacking/hiking, I really encourage you to get one. If you’re going to be in urban areas most of the time, the iPhone 3G will do you just fine when it comes to GPS messaging.

Well thanks to Geonames I can make my random lat/lon SPOT checkins a lot more interesting because they have a huge set of reverse geocoding web services. Reverse geocoding lets you take a latitude and longitude coordinate and then give figure out what it’s close to. With Geonames you can get the closest address, closest place name, closest neighborhood, or basically anything you want. So now I’m building in reverse geocode lookup into my application so I can check in with latitude and longitude coordinates but then give that a meaningful label.

In general, I was happy with the poles. They’re lightweight, and they condense down to a very short length which makes them ideal for packing away. The weight on them is speced out at 19.85 ounces and they can go from 53 inches to an itty-bitty 25.5 inches. I also liked the foam grip as opposed to the cork that’s on a couple of the other Leki poles. I decided to go with an Aluminum base instead of the trendy carbon fiber because my father-in-law had broken a pair of carbon fiber poles just last week. I’m fine with the extra weight I get from the Aluminum if I can be sure they won’t break when I need them the most.

My only real complaint with the Lekis was a big one. I’m not a fan of the “screw” system for changing the poles length. The other pair I looked at, the Black Diamond Trail Shocks have a nice switch that makes it hard for the poles to resize on their own. I found with the Leki poles that they’d come unscrewed on the trail and suddenly decide to shorten when I leaned on them. It meant I had to stop and tighten things back up which was kind of a pain.

Overall they’re good quality poles but I see the screw mechanism as a design flaw and with the price of the Black Diamonds being cheaper I wish I would have gotten them instead.

I’m salivating at the thought of a GPS-enabled iPhone device. Services like Brightkite, and my own personal projects rely heavily on location. Having that in my phone is going to be awesome. But the market for GPSes is far and wide. Is the iPhone going to replace automotive GPS devices? That have the maps preinstalled and work locally? No way. Hiking devices? Not a chance. Having the topo data in the middle of nowhere is key.

My hope is that the iPhone will actually get more people thinking about how GPS can be used in all aspects of their lives. The one area where the iPhone might affect sales is maps. I hate having to pay for updated maps. I sort of get it, but I think it’s annoying. If the iPhone can change how the GPS companies sell maps, that will be a good thing for consumers. I’m willing to pay for updated maps like I do with a data plan, but right now they seem way too expensive for me.

The book works its way through the philosophical history of mountaineering. It talks about how humans first thought of the world and how mountains went from being seen as annoying obstacles to thrilling adventures. It’s a great read for the history, the psychology, and the stories from the mountains.

The trail starts off going down a trail and then turning into a road where it intersects with the dam. The views off the Ross Lake Dam are great so take a moment to stop and enjoy. After crossing the dam the trail goes gradually uphill as it snakes along the lake. There are a couple of small, easy creek crossings along the way. Eventually the trail forks. The right trail goes down to the Ross Lake resort so keep left.

About 1/3 of the way through the trail starts to get higher and break through the trees a bit providing great views of the lake. About half way the trail intersects with with the Sourdough Mountain Trail so keep right and work your way gradually down through more forests. The trail goes through another gradual uphill and crosses a couple of streams before finally finding its way down to Big Beaver Creek. The first campsite along the trail is the Pumpkin Mountain campsite but we continued on to the Big Beaver Creek campsite.

We couldn’t actually find the Big Beaver Creek site. It’s a big area and we found signs for the horse camp and the boat camp but nothing that resembled an actual campsite. Instead we tried to camp in the lowest impact spot possible - an area that is normally covered by water.

Grab our GPX track for the Ross Lake Dam Trail Reversing it will get you to the intersection of the Ross Lake Dam trail and the Big Beaver Creek trail.

Tonight we went to Mailbox Peak (good photos here, review here). It’s about 5 miles round trip with an elevation gain of almost 4000 feet, so you’re spending a lot of time going up; the whole point of a TNAB outing.

The parking lot is just a bit beyond the exit for North Bend on I-90. The trail itself starts off fairly level through some dense forest before turning into switchbacks on the way up. The switchbacks last about 1/3rd of the way up and they’ve been pretty well groomed so the trail is easy to find. After the first set of switchbacks you continue in pretty dense forest through a combination of switchbacks and straight up the mountain. There aren’t a lot of overlooks or flat areas here, you’ve still got to gain a bunch of elevation.

About halfway up the mountain you’ll come to a fork. Each fork has the telltale orange dots and the one on the right has a bunch of the dots on a tree. Either fork will get you to the top, I took the one on the right. After the fork the trail gets kind of dicey. You can continue to follow the orange dots and they’re pretty evenly spaced. You’ll be doing a bit of switchbacks and a bit of straight up and the actual trail starts to disappear. If you follow the orange blazes you’ll come to a tree with an orange X blazed on it. I have no idea what this is. At that point you’ll want to veer towards the left and get on the ridge where the trail is more pronounced.

You’ll continue along the ridge slowly getting high enough where the trees start getting smaller and you can see some views. In May, we started hitting snow here and by another 500 feet it was all snow. You’ll eventually come out on a boulder field. Continue on through the field into a grove of trees and when you come out of the trees you’ll see the slope up to the summit. It’s a pretty easy (but steep) climb to the top.

The hardest part with the Thursday Night Afterburners is the way down. We hit the summit a little bit before 8:00 PM I think as the sun was going down. We spent most of the hike back in pure darkness. You basically have to put your headlamp down, pay attention to the shadows, and place footing carefully. It was kind of crazy but it was a lot of fun. All in all, a great trip. I have some videos on Flickr and I’ll post the GPX file of the trip here as soon as I get it. All in all it was quite a workout.

Brightkite

So one tip I figured out recently is that you can actually use longitude and latitude in decimal degrees format in lieu of an address. So you don’t actually have to be anywhere specific to check in. Because of the way the site works you’ll still see notes and photos from people close by, so if you’re in the boonies or a foreign country, using lat/lon coordinates would be a good way to go.

I have a couple of nitpicks about the site however. One is that with all this Ajaxy goodness they didn’t take the time to make photo uploading easy. Instead of letting me upload any photo and doing some basic cropping and resizing I have to stick within the guidelines. Also, when using the trip finder, it’s hard to find things by activity. For instance, if I’m looking for a backpacking trip instead of a hiking trip I’d like to be able to see that before I click on it. You can sort of tell with mileage but it’s not perfect.

But in general it’s a great site and a great way to find interesting places to go. Once you drill down on a trip you can download the waypoints, see the trip plotted on a map, comment, and rate the trip. Another great feature of the enhanced Google Maps that they use is you can get the Topo data as well as the Terrain data. I think Backpacker.com will have an easier time of building a community than, say, Outdoorzy, just because of the built in readership.

But no APIs show we’re still in the infancy of Web 2.0 in the outdoors. But the new Backpacker is a good start.